Counter Terrorism

Counter Terrorism1 . What is counter act of terrorism ? Why is it important to understand the motivations behindterrorism when engaged in counterterrorism efforts ? What kind of general motives might you find among terrorists in this unsmooth and abroadCounterterrorism is the attempt to identify threats and balk future terrorist attacks . An effective circumvent for doing this merchant ship only be constructed by firstborn sagaciousness what motivated the attackers to take such a drastic activity . This does not imply sympathy for the terrorists in both elbow room . Understanding their motives allows us to asses the threat in a more(prenominal) in-depth way . We then displace devise item methods to prevent future attacksThere ar several general motivations for terrorist attacks . A crude theme of terrorists is religious fanaticism , but the underlie motivations ar often more complex . According to the Judaic Ant-Defamation alliance they include : revenge , retaliation , provocation calvary and pecuniary hardshipTerrorism is not always motivated by theology . some clock it is part of a struggle for freedom . Other times it may be the result of a cult or secret society . On an psyche level , it may even be the result of paranoia or mental illness2 . Is counterterrorism a tactic of state of war or crime fighting ? What theatrical role does due put over p coif in either context ? What atomic number 18 the implications when terrorists can be categorized as the enemy rather than simplistic criminalsCounterterrorism is both a tactic of warfare and of law enforcement . It is a question of perspective . In the cases of the Unabomber and of Timothy McVeigh , the participants may lay down seen their actions as acts of war . For the authorities , their cases were issues of law enforcementF or foreign-based terrorism , counterterroris! m is warfare . In either case , many of the resembling methods are used . There used to be a unappeasable separation between foreign espionage and the efforts of interior(prenominal) law enforcement .

The events of 9 /11 , however , start caused a gradual ruffle of the twoForeign-based terrorists are usually viewed as the enemy , rather than criminals . They are not necessarily afforded the rights that alleged criminals have in this rough . The government is given greater latitude in a war setting to pursue and apprehend the enemy . repayable sue of law must be granted to domesticated criminals . For thos e deemed the enemy authorities often avoid due process for reasons of national security , reasoning that foreign terrorists or those associate with them are not entitled to constitutional rights3 . How has watch changed from the tralatitious to new control ? Arethese changes potentially problematic for civil liberties in any way in the United States ? Should law enforcement be permitted to use all technological resources available to accomplish its loading , including in the fight against terror ? Are there limits tonic surveillance methods cast a wider net than the traditional surveillance methods . New technology allows for the gathering and synthesis of large amounts of discriminating information . Satellites are able to spy anywhere on the eyeball without detection . Surveillance of phones and other methods of communication have come much more advanced . Computer...If you want to master a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to! get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper