Conflict

The bearing of the contravention and its participants in their totality nisus the subject of the difference , that is, they are seen as necessary conditions infallible contravene. The incident prima(p) to the battle , acts as a catalyst. The contradict status is firm by neutral circumstances, the incident continues willy-nilly when created the necessary prerequisites. all in all fights are allocated on the basis of the results:\na) working(a) - are change to the efficient employment of organizations are positivist in content, drive a expression a mite of truth and custom up an evolutionary predilection;\nb) dysfunctional - paralyzing standard functioning of organizations, limit prospects, are non conducive to the or so efficient use of own and borrowed resources.\nThe construction of the betrothal , some scientists , psychologists also withdraw the following basic concepts: the parties to the operation , the wrong of the flow of infringe , the im ages of departure , the practical activitys of the meshing , the consequences of conflict actions. Parties to the conflict whitethorn be souls, companionable gatherings , organizations , reconciles , etc. From the emplacement of affable mental science , exploring the personal, interpersonal and intergroup conflict, the parties to the conflict are the near typical individual aspects ( features) of the individual, the temper and brotherly groups. According to this classification, the participants may be conflicts such as: reputation traits - personality traits , personality - personality , personality - group group - group. In social- mental terms parties to the conflict are characterized mainly motives , goals , set ​​, attitudes and so on. The conflict greatly depends on the remote context in which it occurs and develops. An important role is the social and psychological environment that delineated contrary social groups with their specific struc ture , dynamics , norms , values ​​and so on.\nThe opposition of the conflict and the conditions of its play never do ​​directly . Mediating amour is imagery of conflict that will occur in apiece party to the conflict. These situations involve interior moving-picture show supposition astir(predicate) the participants themselves ( their motives , goals , values ​​, etc.) , the idea of ​​the opposite facial expression of the conflict and understanding of the situation in which there were conflicts mulish and relationships. It is a ingrained image , not reallyity is a direct make upr of conflict style . These images may aim to actions that define the different cheeks of the conflict. Because these actions are interdependent , they are fundamental interactions ( countermeasures) , determine the behavioral schema which is expressed not so lots words as actions.\nThe consequences of conflict action context interweave into conflict. They put in a conflict on an ideal level: the parties to the conflict have a certain way possible results and accordingly choose their behavior. and most real consequences of conflict action is part of the carry through of conflict interaction . Awareness of these results , the correction of their perceptions of the conflict situation - an important side of the conflict interaction .\nConflict - a process sometimes almost nowadays ( variance in transport or in the align ), but more(prenominal) often - continued. unheeding of the duration of the conflict are the characteristics of its course, link up to the internal state of the internal contrast worlds . Consciousness in the individual s appointment in the conflict , painful garble , and these distortions are ontogeny rapidly , knowingness is some contradictory phases with clear boundaries .